- Chromecast remote cover android#
- Chromecast remote cover software#
- Chromecast remote cover Bluetooth#
Wireless protocols supported by the CGTV, thereby explaining the FCC certification necessity, include (again from Google’s published specs): Here are some overview shots:Īnd here’s a closeup of the bottom-side product markings, including the all-important FCC IC, A4RGZRNL (the FCC ID for the newer “HD” version of the CGTV, conversely, is A4RG454V): A majority of that total 6.4” length, perhaps obviously is the HDMI cable the main body is 3” long. The product dimensions, direct from Google’s published specs, are “6.4 x 2.4 x 0.5 in (162 mm x 61 mm x 12.5 mm), not including cables or accessories” and the weight is “56.7 g (2 oz)”. I want to keep it intact as a spare, just in case the primary ever gets lost between the sofa cushions, doncha know. Sorry, folks, but that’s all you’re going to see of the remote. Here are photos of it absent its protective baggie:
Chromecast remote cover software#
Alternatively, if the TV or soundbar is IR-based, the CGTV’s remote can also directly manage it the CGTV software embeds common control code sets, which you configure in the device settings for your specific IR-based product. And since the CGTV’s HDMI 2.0 output supports the CEC ( Consumer Electronics Control) protocol, you can also use the remote to manage power on/off, volume and input selection for a HDMI-connected TV or soundbar (assuming, of course, that it’s also HDMI-CEC cognizant).
Chromecast remote cover Bluetooth#
Bluetooth is for connectivity to the CGTV, which is nice because it doesn’t require line-of-sight. It’s somewhat unique in that it comprehends both Bluetooth and IR (infrared) protocols, along with containing a microphone for voice control as an alternative to the various front buttons. Note the 5V/1.5A power requirement of the CGTV: Here are some images of the various box-content bits, in some cases, accompanied by a 0.75″ (19.1 mm) diameter and 0.06” (1.52 mm) thick U.S. Open the lid and the first thing you’ll see inside are two smaller boxes, one obviously labeled as containing the CGTV, the other holding the companion remote control:Īnd underneath that are the power adapter and cable, along with a set of AAA batteries for the remote control: The CGTV, like its Roku siblings, can also act as a streaming adapter, but it’s fundamentally intended to be a standalone device.Įlucidation over, let’s as usual begin with some outer box shots: This device isn’t solely a streaming media adapter like Google’s conventional Chromecasts (a first-generation one of which I already tore down a few years ago) or even the 4K-compatible Ultra model, all of which are dependent on a tablet, smartphone, computer or other streaming content source. You’ve probably already noticed that I’m specifically referring to this as the “Chromecast with Google TV”.
Chromecast remote cover android#
I like the CGTV a lot I wish it supported the Android Xfinity Stream app (I can’t help but chuckle when I see Google tech support suggesting that folks sideload the app instead), but right next to it is an Xbox 360 acting as a Comcast-fed Media Center Extender that’s connected to another input of that same HDMI switch, so no biggie.īefore diving in, a clarification. As I mentioned in that late-2020 writeup, I’d actually paid $89.99 for mine, bundled with 6 months of Netflix service…which unexpectedly ended up getting extended to a year of Netflix service. Specifically, mine’s one of the original 4K resolution-capable units introduced in September 2020, not the newer ( September 2022) and less expensive ($29.99 vs $49.99) albeit “only” 1080p-max “HD” model. Instead, connected to a multi-input HDMI switch (and from there to an ancient but still functional large-screen LCD computer monitor) there’s a Google Chromecast with Google TV, which from now on I’ll mostly refer to as the CGTV to keep character count down, and which longstanding readers with long memories may remember made my 2020 holiday shopping-recommendations list: But my office is Roku-less-not reflective of any particular anti-Roku bias, mind you I’m just striving for evaluation diversity. As I write these words, in fact, there are five of ‘em residing in various rooms of my abode. I’ve long used, written about and even dismantled various models (and generations of models) of Roku streaming devices.
0 kommentar(er)
